Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

June 01 2017

3386 1595
Look Ma! No hands!
Reposted fromvolldost volldost viaaperture aperture

May 31 2017

May 23 2017

Reposted fromqb qb viasofias sofias

May 20 2017

3996 0c88
Reposted fromkaiee kaiee viasilsha silsha
5702 f2d7 500
Reposted fromNeutrum Neutrum viasilsha silsha
5416 3fb2
8053 f2dc
Reposted fromlokrund2015 lokrund2015 viaiks iks

May 12 2017

4584 8b0e 500
Reposted fromGIFer GIFer viaCarridwen Carridwen

May 11 2017

9420 ae93
Reposted frompsyolopher psyolopher viaRekrut-K Rekrut-K
6083 16c3 500


April 23 2017

5242 8e07




Website | Facebook | Twitter

Reposted fromitslikerufus itslikerufus

April 17 2017

Reposted fromFlau Flau viajagger jagger

March 31 2017

2797 8c70 500



you are missing something! although those are the boots of the apollo 11 suits, they’re not what was worn on the moon. neil armstrong, not content with wearing just one pair of shoes, demanded nasa make him another, larger and cooler pair of boots just for walking on the moon.

you can see them here, to the right of the suit’s built-in boots.

photos of armstrong on the moon prominently feature the boots!

although i couldn’t find any official nasa photos of the bottoms of the boots, i could find something even more interesting! an x-ray of the boots “taken as a last minute check to see if there were any foreign objects that could compromise the integrity of the spacesuit during the mission, such as broken off tips of needles that were used in the stitching process”

the thick vertical lines are the treads at the bottoms of the boots

on a more pragmatic note: if nasa was faking a moon landing with a $150 billion+ budget, do you really think they’d mess up something as simple as a boot print?

Reposted fromforestheart1 forestheart1 viagaf gaf
4030 6634 500
Reposted fromhagis hagis
Dat evil genius
Reposted fromtojika4 tojika4 viasofias sofias

March 22 2017

1044 e0f3 500
Reposted fromswissfondue swissfondue viastraycat straycat
4354 b7ba
Reposted fromhagis hagis

March 18 2017

(via @c3o)

Growth hack for your web app: Just go offline for 3 weeks, say no word, return with over a year of user data lost. Worked for @soup_io

Reposted fromwonko wonko viayetzt yetzt
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!